
Risk assessment is crucial to successful OHS management.
This workshop, held in Perth in late October 2005, attracted fifty five participants who were divided into a number of teams. The idea originated after studying a UK Health and Safety Executive report of research conducted on the reasons for less than adequate (LTA) risk assessment.
Professor Jim Joy from Queensland agreed to facilitate the workshop.
As part of the workshop, participants were invited to consider a real life risk assessment report and consider why it, and risk assessment in general, is often less than adequate. This was considered in four parts: Context, Scope/Design, Execution, and Application. The group results were assessed to find out which issues most commonly occurred. Outcomes of the risk assessment process, positive and negative, were then considered, as well as some other recommendations for particular issues.
The results for Context, Scope/Design, Execution, and Application are given here:
Issue |
Recommendation |
Context |
|
|
|
Scope/Design |
|
|
|
Execution |
|
|
|
Application |
|
|
|
There were further specific recommendations for some Scope/Design issues:
Issue |
Recommendations |
Lack of clear definition of risk assessment Too much of a generic approach to the specific task Inadequate process design Selection of risk cases/process |
Apply appropriate risk assessment technique for the situation |
Conflicting goals; production vs safety and financial costs |
Management commitment to budget (time, money, personnel) to make risk assessment an integral part of work processes |
Consensus required for risk assessment development and findings |
Education regarding acceptance of responsibility, and appropriate document design to allow for this |
Lack of understanding of hierarchy of controls |
Education and training |
Post risk assessment outcomes were considered to include the following:
Negative
Positive
The outcomes also depend on activities that occurred earlier in the process.
Issue |
Recommendations |
1. Hazard identification during the risk assessment. |
|
|
Management commitment |
|
Process Procedure Training - Define mandated requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Attitude to risk assessment exercise |
|
|
Management commitment Audit process |
3. Use of hierarchy of controls |
Refer 1. above |
|
|
4. Use of risk analysis methods |
|
|
Refer 1 above |
Issue |
Recommendations |
No definition of accountability |
Assign, add to form |
Lack of process for accountability |
Provide for a process to define and assign accountability |
Issues |
Recommendations |
Lack of understanding by manager of risk assessment process |
Management education/commitment |
Committing financial resources to implement recommendations and allow for loss of production. |
Adequate dollar resourcing |
Perception by management of risk aversion |
Management education/commitment |
Issues |
Recommendations |
Lack of resources, time , people with knowledge |
More time, more people or better utilisation of resources |
Concerns about hindered production |
Improve commitment by management |
Issues |
Recommendations |
Lack of understanding of process |
Education/training |
Not monitoring |
Monitoring |
Failure to anticipate and recognise |
Inspection and auditing (regular) |
Lack of planning/wrong planning |
Forecasting, planning |
Reluctance to stop for unexpected events |
Stop until change is assessed |
Management bias to ‘nice’ outcomes |
Change organisational culture |
Issue |
Recommendations |
Hazard identification |
Correct by collating information training in hazard identification and get it back out to industry so hazards can be identified Better access and dissemination of industry experiences/information |
Attitude to risk assessment |
Management commitment to active involvement and follow-up by providing resources to allow monitoring and control
|
Use of hierarchy of controls |
Management commitment to following the hierarchy and documentation provided to demonstrate higher order controls not available. Senior manager to authorise |
Use of risk analysis methods |
Need to be appropriate to the task May use more than one method |